MacquarieCoral transformation

Replatforming credit risk.
Rethinking how we design.

Modernising a 25-year-old platform by bringing fragmented analyst workflows, legacy tools and disconnected data into one connected experience.

Role: Lead product designer

Scope: Credit reviews, information architecture, UI and shared design foundations

Team: Product, Design, Engineering and Data

Timeframe: 2024–present · Multi-year transformation

Explore the product designs

01 — The Product

Rethinking 25 years of legacy workflows

Modernise 25 years of legacy workflows without disrupting the people who rely on them.

The design challenge

More than a new interface

I joined Macquarie to lead product design for Coral, the programme replacing Credit Workstation, a platform that had supported the bank’s credit-risk operations for 25 years.

We needed to understand how analysts and approvers worked, untangle legacy processes and design a better experience without disrupting the business.

Counterparties

The businesses Macquarie works with and their connections to other businesses.

Limits & exposures

The lending limits and financial risk associated with those businesses.

Credit reviews

How analysts assess businesses and their lending risk.

Scorecards

How analysts assess and quantify a business’s risk of default.

Two connected challenges

Make the data accessible

Migrate data from the legacy platform cleanly, while supporting a shift from consuming information to producing structured data that can be shared across Macquarie Group.

Bring credit analysis into Coral

Move work from PowerPoint and Excel into the platform, giving analysts enough flexibility to do their jobs without recreating the Microsoft suite.

“To design a better product, we also had to improve the way we designed it.”

02 — The Design Practice

Improving how we design and deliver

Better foundations for a connected product

Multiple designers were working across interconnected areas of Coral. We needed shared patterns, clearer decisions and stronger collaboration to keep the experience consistent and avoid solving the same problems repeatedly.

Design system & consistency

Improve shared components, interaction patterns and design standards across the platform.

Processes & collaboration

Strengthen critiques, decision documentation and collaboration across Design, Product and Technology.

AI in design delivery

Use AI to support research, exploration, documentation and prototyping, and reduce repetitive work.

Making the practice part of delivery

Weekly design critiques

Challenge interaction choices and improve consistency across workstreams.

Fortnightly stakeholder sessions

Bring Risk, Product and Engineering into decisions before delivery.

Weekly planning

Make priorities, dependencies and ownership visible across workstreams.

Fortnightly retrospectives

Surface friction and improve how the team works together.

Delivery checkpoints

Review at key milestones to identify risks early and keep delivery aligned.

Design governance

Establish shared patterns and review points to protect coherence as Coral evolves.

Understanding our users

A shared understanding of who uses Coral

We brought Product, Business and Technology together to define the people using Coral, their goals and their responsibilities.

01 / ANALYSIS

Business analysts

Analyse counterparties, prepare reviews and manage risk assessments across a portfolio.

02 / DECISIONS

Business approver

Review recommendations, challenge assumptions and approve key credit decisions.

03 / OPERATIONS

Credit Ops

Maintain data quality, manage operational processes and ensure compliance requirements are met.

04 / SPECIALIST RISK

Troubled Assets

Manage high-risk counterparties, restructure exposures and monitor distressed portfolios.

A foundation for user access management

Clear user definitions established the foundation for future role-based permissions, governance controls and scalable access models.

Rethinking information architecture

Question the structure, not just the labels

Over 25 years, Credit Workstation had accumulated features, workflows and navigation patterns. Migration was an opportunity to rethink what belonged together, simplify the experience and establish a structure that could grow with the business.

Legacy complexity

Incremental change had left workflows fragmented and information difficult to find.

Migration constraints

Phased delivery needed to preserve essential workflows.

Present and future needs

Solve today’s problems while leaving room for the platform to grow.

Consistency at scale

Parallel workstreams needed shared navigation patterns to feel like one platform.

From legacy structure to a shared framework

We combined business and technical knowledge with qualitative and quantitative research, accounting for the realities of migration.

  1. Discovery & audit

    Audit the existing platform, workflows and navigation to understand migration impacts and identify opportunities to simplify.

  2. Architecture workshops

    Align Product, Business and Technology on navigation principles, platform structure and the future state.

  3. Card sorting

    Work directly with users to understand how they group information, tasks and business concepts.

  4. Tree testing

    Validate the proposed structure through findability and task-success testing.

  5. Navigation framework

    Translate workshop outcomes and research into a visual framework that teams can review, refine and adopt.

What this work produced

A shared information architecture framework, informed by research, tested against real tasks and designed to support a consistent experience as Coral evolves.

A shared future-state vision

One direction across many workstreams

Teams were redesigning different parts of Coral at the same time. Without a shared direction, we risked recreating the fragmentation of the legacy platform.

The future-state blueprint became a decision-making reference: a way to connect feature choices to the whole experience while delivery continued in phases.

Alignment

Make the intended end-to-end journey visible to Business, Product and Technology.

A decision guide

Compare individual choices against the broader experience.

Delivery confidence

Give workstreams a common destination while allowing phased delivery.

From requirements to delivery

  1. Start with requirements

    Identify the business requirements and outcomes the platform needs to support.

  2. Shape the plan

    Map a high-level journey around the major pain points.

  3. Prototype with AI

    Build a representative journey that touches those pain points.

  4. Review with the team

    Challenge assumptions and surface gaps together.

  5. Refine requirements

    Turn feedback into clearer, more detailed business requirements.

  6. Design for delivery

    Polish the designs and shape a practical path to implementation.

Delivering through vertical slices

Prove the journey

Start with one complete credit review

We tested a simple credit review from trigger to final approval, touching every key step. This helped us see how the platform worked as a connected experience while allowing teams to deliver incrementally.

  1. Trigger
  2. Single counterparty analyst input
  3. Add limits
  4. Complete a scorecard
  5. Reviewer input
  6. Approver input
  7. Queries & comments
  8. Set conditions
  9. Approve & finalise

A proven foundation for delivery

The vertical slice produced a validated end-to-end experience, reusable design patterns and a shared blueprint. It helped teams identify gaps early and reduce uncertainty.

Then scale the same journey

We expanded the journey to handle more complex scenarios: 30+ counterparty analysts, multiple limits and limit types, multiple scorecards, reviewers, approvers and conditions.

One connected experience

Test the transitions between capabilities, not only the individual screens.

Reusable patterns

Build complex scenarios on the interactions established in the simple slice.

Incremental delivery

Give teams a shared blueprint while capabilities evolve in phases.

Find counterparties without knowing the exact name

The legacy search allowed one field at a time: short name or legal name. Users had to choose exact-match or contains, then enter a matching keyword or letter sequence.

We redesigned search around flexible queries, visible filters and useful context in the results.

SEARCH / BEFORE

A restrictive starting point

The legacy interface required users to understand the search rules before they could find a counterparty.

SEARCH / PROPOSED EXPERIENCE

Search broadly. Refine with context.

Analysts can start with a keyword, narrow results with optional filters and review relevant details directly in the results table.

The decisions behind search

Search broadly

Allow a flexible term before users know a legal or short name.

Keep filters visible

Show applied criteria so users can refine a query without losing context.

Support quick scanning

Surface relevant risk attributes directly in the results table.

The trade-off

Keep common searches simple, and reveal advanced filters when they are needed.

Bringing reviews into Coral

From separate documents to structured information

Credit reviews combined detailed analysis with supporting paperwork, often held outside Coral in PowerPoint and Excel.

Bringing analysis into Coral allowed each review to create structured information that teams across Macquarie Group could access, share and use.

REVIEWS / BEFORE

Analysis lived outside the platform

The existing review record did not bring all the analysis and supporting work into one connected workspace.

REVIEWS / WORKSPACE

Keep the review and its context together

The proposed workspace brings analyst input, linked risk data and conversations alongside the primary task.

Proposed workspace. Delivery status varies by capability.

The interaction model behind a review

Keep context

Keep the review summary, analyst input and linked risk data together.

Query in place

Make questions and responses available alongside the evidence.

Separate approval

Distinguish comments, queries, conditions and final decisions.

Support parallel work

Analysts, reviewers and approvers need to collaborate without disrupting the primary analysis flow. The same structure must support multiple contributors and conditions.

REVIEWS / INTERACTIONS

Collaboration alongside the evidence

A side panel supports conversations and responses while keeping the review in view. This block is ready for the final interaction visual.

+

Review interaction detail

Final visual to be added

REVIEWS / CONNECTED WORKFLOWS

Bring scorecards and complex reviews into the journey

The wider experience connects scorecards, multiple contributors, limits and conditions within the review workflow. This block is reserved for the final supporting visual.

+

Connected review journey

Final visual to be added

Foundations for what comes next

Ongoing transformation · 2024–present

A platform foundation and a stronger design practice

Coral brings product redesign and design leadership together. The work establishes shared structures for navigation, review workflows and collaboration, alongside a more consistent way for teams to design and deliver.

Shared understanding

Defined user roles and responsibilities provide a foundation for access management and governance.

Connected workflows

Vertical slices connect capabilities into an end-to-end credit-review journey.

Consistent delivery

Shared patterns, critique and decision-making practices help workstreams move toward the same vision.

The work continues

This is a multi-year transformation with phased delivery. The designs show the intended experience; individual capabilities are at different stages of delivery.

Thanks for exploring my work.

Victor Beltrame · Coral, MacquarieIllustration placeholders by Jane Noh.
Back to top